Eduflack

"They'd Rather FIght Everything ..."

Eduflack — Tue, 22 May 2012 09:22:00 GMT

"I think that was the great tragedy of [the No Child Left Behind Act], the complete lack of real input the education establishment had, and it goes a long way to explaining the problems with the law. That tragedy continues today with teacher evaluations. But the fact that they didn't have a seat at the table was because they'd decided they'd rather fight everything than compromise."

- Patrick J. McGuinn, associate professor of political science at Drew University, in Education Week's Relationship Between Advocacy Groups, Unions Uneasy, by Stephen Sawchuk

"A Well-Run Charter System ..."

Eduflack — Mon, 21 May 2012 13:24:20 GMT

"But a well-run charter system ought to find supporters among both advocates of school choice and people who worry that teacher evaluation will grow too rigid."

- Washington Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt in his May 20th piece, Teachers much make the grade in charter schools.

Just the Facts

Eduflack — Thu, 17 May 2012 13:30:26 GMT

Many Generation Xers may remember the cartoon G.I. Joe remaining us every week that "knowing is half the battle." And with all of the facts and figures thrown around during education reform discussions, knowing the statistics is definitely a non-negotiable.

In recent months, Eduflack has been writing a lot about the reform efforts in Connecticut. This week, the Connecticut Coalition for Achievement Now (ConnCAN) released its Field Guide to Education in Connecticut 2012. This document, available in both hard and soft copy, provides educators and advocates, policymakers and parents with a one-stop shop when it comes to education statistics in the Nutmeg State.

From stats on who attends Connecticut's public schools to achievement gaps, spending to test scores, the Field Guide has it all. And it serves as a primer for those who are looking to understand the state of public education in a state like Connecticut.

Happy reading!

(Full disclosure: Eduflack is not only affiliated with ConnCAN, but he heads the org.)

"Meaningful Education Reforms" in CT

Eduflack — Wed, 16 May 2012 13:05:58 GMT

“I commend Connecticut for coming together to enact meaningful education reforms that will benefit students. I know the negotiations on S.B. 458 were difficult, but Governor Malloy and the Legislature, business, unions, educators, and advocates were committed to begin fixing what is broken in public schools. The final bill includes important reforms in early reading, school turnarounds, school choice, and school staffing and delivers more resources targeted to those districts and schools with the greatest need. Now that Governor Malloy has enacted the law, Connecticut can begin the hard work of putting these important reforms to work in the classroom.”

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, in a May 15, 2012 statement

Migrating from AYP

Eduflack — Tue, 15 May 2012 13:44:13 GMT

Virtually every state in the union is working to get out from under No Child Left Behind and its measure of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Thanks to the U.S. Department's efforts to offer "NCLB waivers" most states have submitted applications to do just that, veer away from the AYP standard established a decade ago and chart a new path that still demonstrates forward progress.

Over at Education Week, Andrew Ujifusa has a piece outlining the plans many states are crafting for their post-NCLB existences. From letter grades to stars, many states are looking for new ways to demonstrate progress to both policymakers and parents, in a way that put there districts and schools in the best light possible.

Take, for instance, the plan offered up by Ohio. According to Education Week, Ohio's plan is as follows:

A-F letter-grading system, based on 4 points. A school with 3.67 points or more earns an A, and a school getting 0.67 points or below earns an F.
A school cannot earn an A on the “achievement and graduation gap” portion of its score if one of four groups (all students, white non-Hispanic students, disadvantaged students, and students with disabilities) earns a C, D, or F.
Based on 2011 data, under the new A-F system, 24.8 percent of 3,103 traditional public schools (charters not included) would have earned A’s, 33.2 percent would have earned B’s, and 23.9 percent would have earned C’s.

Will it work? Most states will likely win their NCLB waiver requests, thus giving these states and others the ability to enact their versions of AYP 2.0. But how many years will it take before we know if this latest version of accountability works or not?

Real Reform in the CT

Eduflack — Wed, 09 May 2012 17:41:21 GMT

For many, the notion of meaningful education reform in a blue state with strong teachers unions and a general resistance to change is a thing of folly. In a state known as "The Land of Steady Habits," can reform really take hold?

After watching the past few months up in Connecticut, the answer is a resounding yes. Governor Dannel Malloy has demonstrated the sort of leadership we all seek from our officials, standing strong, fighting for what he believes in, and never wavering from his promise of doing right by the kids and families of Connecticut.

Malloy's efforts, coupled with the hard work and fire demonstrated by Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor, the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus, legislative leadership, teachers, principals, superintendents, school boards, the business community, parents, and the community at large, have now resulted into a significant step forward for school improvement in Connecticut.

Rather than biting off a small piece now and saving more reforms for later, Malloy et al went at the heart of the issue. The path wasn't easy, most suggested it was too difficult to complete, but when the dust settles on Connecticut's 2012 legislative session, the state will have adopted a comprehensive reform package with the power to have real impact and help provide all students access to great public schools.

Dear ol' Eduflack goes into greater detail on the landmark deal for Connecticut over at 50CAN's Great Big Blog, but the highlights of the legislation that passed the Connecticut Senate by a vote of 28-7 and the House by a unanimous 149-0 decision include:

A new educator evaluation system, to be piloted in 10 districts this year, that makes student learning outcomes the most important element of teacher and principal evaluation
That teacher tenure be earned based on effectiveness
A streamlined dismissal process for chronically ineffective teachers
A Commissioner’s Network for the state’s lowest-performing schools, providing the leadership, structure, funding, flexibility, and accountability to bring real change to those buildings and students who need it most
An evidence-based approach to teaching children to read, providing the instruction, measurement, and accountability to get all kids reading at grade level by fourth grade
Conditional funding for the state’s lowest-performing school districts, offering additional dollars for the implementation of real reforms
A Common Chart of Accounts so, once and for all, all Connecticut public schools account for their spending in a consistent, transparent way
Closer to real equity for Connecticut’s charter school students, providing the largest increase in per-pupil expenditure for charter schools in the state’s history
Additional state-authorized charter schools, including those that serve ELL populations, and providing financial incentives to create locally authorized charters

The significance of these ideas, all part of one comprehensive education reform package, cannot be overstated. While some may want to play down the importance of these efforts or claim that they turned back fictitious reforms never in the bill, these are real gains worthy of real reflection.

Governor Malloy declared 2012 "The Year for Education Reform" in Connecticut. Malloy and legislative leadership are to be credited for delivering on legislation that shakes Connecticut's public schools out of the status quo muck and puts them on the path to 21st century excellence.

Now the hard work begins. Just because this is the year for education reform does not mean it is the only year for reform. Now CT must enact these efforts with fidelity. Now CT must begin to build on these reforms and identify additional changes necessary to improve instruction and learning in all public schools. And now CT must deliver on its promise to do right by its kids, all of its kids.

As Leo McGarry once said on West Wing, "We play the full nine innings at this level." Nothing could be truer for education reform in Connecticut. The Nutmeg State is now in the game. It has taken its first cuts from the batter's box. But we have many more innings to go before the win. But this is a helluva way to approach those early innings.

Speaking for Students

Eduflack — Thu, 03 May 2012 12:49:00 GMT

There is little question that efforts to improve our public schools generate significantly heated rhetoric and emotions on all sides. But when the shouting dies down, does anyone really want to hear a student ask, "who will speak for me?"

That's the level we've reached in the ed reform fight in Connecticut, where the past few months have focused on the adults in the room and what is owed them. But at some point, we need to ask who will stand up and advocate for the children in the room?

Over in the Connecticut Mirror, Eduflack has a commentary addressing that very question:

For months now, folks have spoken loudly in support of the adults in the room. We have spent week after week, hour after hour, discussing property rights, dismissal procedures and windows for contract negotiations. We've seen hundreds of teachers dance at a rally as our schools and students suffer, and as legislators tell those teachers they won't have to agree to any uncomfortable changes that might benefit students. Yet we know 130,000 students remain trapped in failing schools, 9,000 won't graduate this year, and thousands more will "graduate" but will be completely unprepared for the challenges of work and life in 2012 and beyond.

Should Teacher Eval Mean Something?

Eduflack — Wed, 02 May 2012 11:47:22 GMT

In the fight to close the achievement gap and ensure all kids have access to great public schools, what is the role of the teachers' union? I'm not talking teachers, we know how essential great teachers are to learning and achievement. But when we talk about reform, shouldn't the unions be part of the solution, rather than an obstacle protecting the problem?

Dear ol' Eduflack addresses this issue in this morning's New York Post, reflecting on school improvement efforts in Connecticut, the unions' initial rhetoric that they were supportive of reforms, and how they have now balked at the process of real accountability and improvement.

From my piece:

The CEA claimed that linking evaluations and staffing decisions was “beyond [its] wildest nightmare”; it’s mounting a full-fledged campaign against any attempt to establish the link. It’s convinced some teachers to fear any linkage — so teachers have been shouting down the governor at town-hall meetings and even calling him a liar when he tried to correct the misconceptions.

What of the AFT? The national union, led by former New York City teacher-union chief Randi Weingarten, has been a key player in the development and early implementation of similar evaluation systems in states and cities across the country. The Connecticut chapter will be at odds with its national affiliate if it blocks key reforms — yet Weingarten’s silence has been deafening so far.

Happy reading!

The Most Useless College Majors

Eduflack — Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:23:23 GMT

We used to joke about those who took classes like "children's games," "rocks for jocks," or even "underwater basket weaving" while in college. That was then, when college degrees guaranteed gainful employment. This is now, when a liberal arts degree guarantees very little.

The folks over at The Daily Beast have identified The 13 Most Useless Majors. The list derives from Anthony Carnevale et al's recent study, Hard Times: College Majors, Unemployment, and Earnings. The list was comprised looking at factors such as recent graduate employment, experienced graduate employment, recent graduate earnings, experienced graduate earnings, and projected growth in total number of jobs from 2010 to 2020.

So what undergraduate degrees made the dubious baker's dozen?

1. Fine arts

2. Drama and theatre arts

3. Film, video, and photographic arts

4. Commercial art and graphic design

5. Architecture

6. Philosophy and religious studies

7. English literature and language

8. Journalism

9. Anthropology and archeology

10. Hospitality management

11. Music

12. History

13. Political science and government

Clearly, the arts don't seem to be doing well in this economy, with art-related majors holding five or six of the spots, depending on how you look at them. And it seems that the path to being the next Mike Brady, Indiana Jones, or Woodward and Bernstein don't look too bright these days.

Our second president, John Adams, once said, "I must study politics and war, that my sons have the liberty to study mathematics and philosophy, natural history, and naval architecture, in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, tapestry, and porcelain."

Based on Carnevale's work and the current economy, I don't think there are many now hoping their kids will be studying poetry and porcelain.

The Eduflack Theme Song

Eduflack — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:40:13 GMT

Loyal Eduflack readers know that, from time to time, I like to write about the personal theme song. We all should have one, that ditty that inspires or that speaks to what makes you tick.

For Eduflack, that song has long been "Against the Grain," by Garth Brooks (from his 1991 Ropin' the Wind album). Not one of his more well-known songs, but one that describes Eduflack, my work, and my push to a tee.

If you can ignore the cheesy graphics, you can listen to the song here.

And here are those inspirational (at least to me) words:

"Folks call me a maverick
Guess I aint to diplomatic
I just never been the kind to go along
Just avoidin' confrontation
For the sake of conformation
And I'll admit I tend to sing a different song
But sometimes you just can't be afraid to wear a different hat
If Columbus had complied
Then this old world might still be flat
Nothin' ventured, nothin gained
sometimes you've got to go against the grain

Well' I've been accused
Of makin' my own rules
There must be rebel blood
Just a-runnin' through my veins
But I aint no hypocrite
What you see is what you get
And that's the only way I know to play the game.
Old Noah took much ridicule
For building his great ark
But for forty days and forty nights
He was lookin' pretty smart
Sometimes it's best to brave the wind and rain
By havin' strength to go against the grain

Well, there's more folks than a few
Who share my point of view
But they're worried if they're gonna sink or swim
They'd like to buck the system
But the deck is stacked against them
And they're a little scared to go out on a limb
But if you're gonna make a difference
If you're gonna leave you're mark
You can't follow like a bunch of sheep
You got to listen to your heart
Go bustin' in like old John Wayne
Sometimes you've got to go against the grain

Nothin ventured, nothin gained
Sometimes you've got to go against the grain."

Why Fear Choice?

Eduflack — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:19:00 GMT

According to Section 5210(1) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), the Federal Government offers a comprehensive definition of a "charter school." The full definition actually has 12 components to it, including:

* Operates in pursuit of a specific set of educational objectives determined by the school's developer and agreed to by the authorized public chartering agency

* Complies with the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

* Meets all applicable Federal, State, and local health and safety requirements

* Operates in accordance with State law

But there are two components of the definition that are most interesting, and relevant to the discussion of education reform.

First, A charter school "is a school to which parents choose to send their children, and that admits students on the basis of a lottery, if more students apply for admission than can be accommodated."

Second, A charter school "has a written performance contract with the authorized public chartering agency in the State that includes a description of how student performance will be measured in charter schools pursuant to State assessments that are required of other schools and pursuant to any other assessments mutually agreeable to the authorized public chartering agency and the charter school."

So charter schools are public schools. They have to operate in accordance with all state laws and Federal requirements. They must meet specific educational objectives. They must be held accountable for their performance and for the performance of their students. And they encourage family involvement by giving parents a choice.

Sounds good, right? Then why do spend so much time fighting about charter schools? Why do we pit public schools against each other, with charter opponents alleging that public charter schools "steal" money from traditional public schools? Why do antagonists paint public charter schools, run by not-for-profits, as the gateway to school privatization and profiteering? Why do we bemoan a lack of parental engagement in the classroom, then condemn those families that demonstrate their engagement by seeking to enroll their children in a public charter school?

There is no one-size-fits-all student, no one-size-fits-all method of instruction, and certainly no one-size-fits-all type of school. We should be looking for ways we can offer a full portfolio of school choices -- traditional publics, charters, magnets, technicals, vo-ags, and the rest -- that are designed to meet student needs, family desires, and community expectations. And we should be positioned to learn from all of the above, using best and promising practices to improve that full portfolio of public schools for all of our kids.

Despite the fear promoted by many charter opponents, public charter schools are not in the business of looking to take over the public schools. They are public schools looking to provide choice to families looking alternatives. They are public schools looking to provide opportunity to those who feel locked in a failed situation. They may not be for every student, but for some, they are the path to possibility.

Whether a family is looking for a school of choice for better academic opportunities, a safer learning environment, or one of many other reasons, we should be embracing choice. It improves all of our public schools and, more importantly, improves student learning for all, regardless of race, family income, or zip code.

Representing Kids ... or Adults?

Eduflack — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:26:49 GMT

What is the primary objective of a teachers' union? Is it to represent the adults in the system with the ultimate zealousness, or is it to improve student learning and outcomes?

In the 1980s, the great Al Shanker, long-time head of the American Federation of Teachers, was quoted as saying "When schoolchildren start paying union dues, that's when I'll start representing the interests of schoolchildren." And while some believe he may not have said those words, it is easy to see where such sentiment comes from.

For example, let's take a look at the Connecticut Education Association. In reading "About CEA" on the labor union's own website, the CEA defines its role as, "advances and protects the rights of teachers at the bargaining table, and works with state policymakers to continue to elevate the teaching profession."

On that same page, we see the list of accomplishments the "state's largest public employees union" can tout, including creating the State Teachers' Retirement System, written notice on contract non-renewals, collective bargaining, fair dismissal laws, binding arbitration, pension benefits, indoor air quality programs, and increased state aid.

But something important is missing from CEA and many teachers' unions like it. In its nearly 700-word "CEA: The Advocate for Teachers and Public Education," the word "students" only appears twice. Once in saying CEA represents college students looking to become classroom teachers. The second noting that students also benefit from the clean air rules that CEA fought for for its educators.

Let's be clear here. There is nothing wrong with CEA and other teachers' unions advocating, lobbying, and acting on behalf of its members. That is the point of a labor union. It is fighting for the salaries, rights, and benefits of those who pay it dues. In the case of public education, it is fighting for the adults in the room, ensuring those teachers and other educators are protected and don't lose what is "theirs."

But it begs the question, who is fighting for the students in the system? Who is speaking for those kids who are slated to go to an historically failing school? Who is speaking for the kids predestined to attend a drop-out factory? Who is speaking for the kids on the short end of the achievement gap? Who is advocating, lobbying, and acting on behalf of those kids?

In reform fights like those we are having in Connecticut, many school teachers will get up and say they are speaking for their kids (and we'll try to overlook those scenes of ugliness when, at public hearings, teachers have been telling parents and kids to "sit down and shut up," saying they had no business participating in the education reform discussion). And in their heart of hearts, I believe that to be true.

But when a discussion that began by focusing on student achievement, opportunity, and college readiness has devolved into one of tenure, property rights, termination procedures, and what is "owed" teachers who have put their time in the system, one has to wonder. Can one represent both the educators and the students in the same fight? Can you have it both ways when we know the benefits, to students, of excellent teachers yet we have union leaders saying "the last thing I'd want to do is get someone fired?"

There is no question that the rights of the adults in the room are important. But at some point, we need to shift our attention to the students, the very reason why public education exists. Over the weekend, Eduflack wrote about this needed shift in the Connecticut Post, in a piece entitled Conversation Needs to Focus on Children, Not the Adults.

In it, I wrote:

We've spent the past two months hearing the Connecticut Education Association and its local union heads focus exclusively on what is owed the adults in the room. We have heard teachers shout down parents in public forums, hurling insults and indicating that families are to blame for the failures of our school system. We have seen the CEA ads and publications spreading lies and misleading half-truths about the content and meaning behind proposed reforms, and personally attacking supporters of those reforms. No wonder the statewide conversation about reform has focused so much on fear and punishment and so little on what's best for kids.

If we are going to have a serious conversation about improving our public schools, we need to bring all parties to the table -- educators and advocates, parents and policymakers -- and leave the vitriol at the door. The stakes are too high for us not to focus on what matters the most ... real, measurable student learning.

Tenure is "Not a Shield for Incompetence"

Eduflack — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:15:22 GMT

"We have made mistakes. You have to really focus to make sure you're doing everything you can so that kids are first. Tenure, for example. Make sure tenure is about fairness and make sure it's not a shield for incompetence."

- Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers, acknowledging in The Washington Post that "the unions have been too focused on fairness for their members and not necessarily quality in the schools."

It's the Ed Reform Prom!

Eduflack — Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:07:00 GMT

Vision 2032: Shaping the Future of Education. That is the topic of this year's Yale School of Management Education Leadership Conference. The event, hosted by the Yale SOM Education Club, has become a "must attend" for national education reform leaders, offering a virtual who's who in the reform community.

This year's festivities start this evening with a concentrated day of speakers and panels tomorrow. Friday morning kicks off with a morning keynote featuring John King, Kevin Huffman, and Deborah Gist, the state commissioners in New York, Tennessee, and Rhode Island, respectively. The impressive lineup of speakers can be found here.

For those who will be New Haven for the event, dear ol' Eduflack has two roles at the conference. Tonight, I am part of the kickoff panel titled, "Connecticut -- At the Tipping Point?" I'll be discussing the reform efforts in the Land of Steady Habits with Mary Loftus Levine, the president of the Connecticut Education Association, and Paul Vallas, the interim superintendent of Bridgeport Public Schools. Also joining us will be Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy.

Tomorrow, I'm moderating a session on collaboration between school districts, unions, and charter schools. Participants include Garth Harries of New Haven Public Schools, Boston Collegiate Charter School's Shannah Varon, Kelly Tynan of UP Academy Charter School of Boston, and the AFT's Randi Weingarten.

For those attending, welcome to Connecticut (and to New Haven). For those not registered, you should be able to follow the event on Twitter from @YaleELC or by following tweets with the #YaleELC hashtag. It'll be well worth the look.

(Full disclosure, Eduflack served on the Advisory Committee for this year's Yale ELC.)

Happy happy!

Eduflack — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:53:58 GMT

This week, Eduflack celebrates its fifth birthday! That makes this blog about a year younger than my son, and about six months older than my daughter.

So a big thank you to all of those who have helped Eduflack win those awards and recognitions. A big thanks to those who post comments or share content from this blog with others. But most importantly, the biggest of thanks to those who read this blog.

When I first started writing Eduflack, I never thought folks would actually read it (and I'm not being humble here, I actually started writing it because I found the process cathartic). I never quite know what to say to people when they tell me they've been reading for years. So all I can say is thank you, thank you, thank you!

Do We Get CEUs For This?

Eduflack — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:43:39 GMT

Down in Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal has offered an education reform package that leaves most other state reform packages in the dust. Eliminate tenure. Overhaul how teachers are paid. Offer families vouchers to send their kids to private and parochial schools.

And like most states that face such reform proposals, Louisiana's teachers' unions are none too happy. Unions leaders are standing up to the reform proposal. They are speaking out. They are rallying the troops.

But in a new twist, the unions are also getting local school districts to close their schools so that teachers can go to the state capitol to protest. Officially, these newly decided days off are billed as "professional development" days, as the Advocate reports.

According to Learning Forward, the nation's premier organization focused on educator effectiveness, the definition of PD is "a comprehensive, sustained, and intensive approach to improving teachers' and principals' effectiveness in raising student achievement."

Now Eduflack is all for everyone having the right to exercise their First Amendment rights and ensuring that their voice is heard during the legislative process. But all this begs an important question. Does protesting pending legislation, waving signs, speaking out to protect your benefits and the like, serve as a "comprehensive, sustained, and intensive approach" to raising student achievement? Does it demand that taxpayers, through their local school boards, cancel school days for students and pay teachers to go exercise their lobbying rights?

And if it does, can one get CEU credits for lobbying state legislatures or marching against the governor?

Evaluatin' Teaching Hoosiers

Eduflack — Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:14:52 GMT

No, it isn't just states like New York and Connecticut that are currently focused on strengthening teacher evaluations and putting some real teeth into the process. The good folks over at Hechinger Report have previously reported on similar efforts in Florida, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. Next up ... Indiana.

In the latest installment, Hechinger looks at recent developments in the Hoosier State to address teacher effectiveness.

As Scott Elliott and Sarah Butrymowicz report:

Teachers across the state will be rated 1 through 4, with 1 being the lowest. Those ratings will be based in part on the test-scores of their students.
The ratings come with consequences.
Those who receive ineffective ratings can be dismissed at the end of the school year. After two years, anyone twice rated as needing improvement—teachers rated a 1 or 2—also can be fired. Teachers rated in the bottom two categories also can be blocked from receiving a raise.
“This is a culture shift,” said Mindy Schlegel, who leads a new division within the Indiana Department of Education focused on educator effectiveness. “This is saying, ‘If you’re not good, you don’t deserve a raise.’ ”
How significant is this change? Consider this: Currently, many teachers are not observed even once a year. Few are rated as ineffective.
The reform is championed by Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett, who thinks the current system, which leaves evaluation up to each school, does not address poor performance. He pointed to a study of a sample of school districts that showed 99 percent of teachers were rated effective.
Bennett calls that a “statistical impossibility.”

Some required reading, particularly for those who are seriously looking at how to make educator effectiveness efforts meaningful.

Bam! It's Eduflack

Eduflack — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:01:43 GMT

It is time for one of those truly self-serving blog posts, the sorts that toot horns and pat backs.

This week, the Bammy! Awards announced nominations for excellence in education. Included on the lists is Eduflack, which is up for Education Commentator/Blogger.

You can cast your vote for dear ol' Eduflack by visiting the Bammy! site here.

For more information on the Bammy! Awards themselves (Eduflack also serves on the Bammy! Council of Peers), visit here.

Vote early, vote often!

Lessons Learned from the School Board

Eduflack — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:32:42 GMT

Earlier this week, the Falls Church City Council honored dear ol' Eduflack for his "dedicated service" on the Falls Church City School Board, noting "the City is grateful for your serving the students of the City and making the City of Falls Church Public Schools one of the highest-ranking school systems in the United States."

I am very proud of my school board service. It was a privilege for me to serve in elected office, particularly when my charge was to ensure that every child received a world-class public education. I was fortunate to work with two great superintendents, a phenomenal group of educators, engaged parents, and terrific fellow board members.

As a result, I come away with several key lessons learned:

1. Teachers are the engines of successful schools. Teaching, particularly today, is one of the most challenging jobs out there. For schools to succeed and children to achieve, we need excellent educators in every classroom. Those educators must be empowered to do what is best for the students. And those successful educators must be paid fairly.

2. If teachers are the engines, then parents are the gasoline. In Falls Church, we benefited from intense family engagement, with parents eager to be a part of what was happening in their child's classroom, school, or the community at large. For ultimate success, teachers and parents must work in partnership to educate the child.

3. No excuses. In our community, we expected all students to achieve. We competed every year to have the highest high school graduation rate in the state or to be rated the highest achieving district in the DC area (at least according to The Washington Post). We encouraged all students to take AP and IB courses throughout their high school careers. AND we made it a school board priority for the school district to pay the fees for those AP and IB tests. We could not let family income be a barrier to student achievement.

These are lessons that every community -- urban, suburban, or rural -- can all learn from. The value of great educators. The need for engaged parents. The true belief that all can succeed. Imagine how much could happen in public education if we all could adopt these simple lessons.

Ed Reform: Team Play or One-Man Band?

Eduflack — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:48:00 GMT

Are teachers to blame for all that's wrong with our public schools? Of course not. While many frustrated folks may want to put the blame squarely on the shoulders of educators, it simply isn't the case. There are too many factors in the mix for any one individual to bear all the blame.

When we look at problems like achievement gaps and graduation rates, we know that these issues did not materialize overnight. There is no one stakeholder to blame. We all bear responsibility for our situation, be we parent or policymaker, educator or activist.

Why, then, is it OK for the defenders of the status quo to say that only teachers should be involved in education reform efforts?

For years now, we have heard some educators say that those who are not in the classroom have no business engaging in school improvement efforts. That this is only for teachers to solve. The classroom educator knows best.

If teachers aren't solely responsible for our K-12 ills, why would be possibly think that they are solely responsible for fixing all that's wrong in our public schools? It took a village to get us to our current level of educational mediocrity, and it will take a similar village to get us back on an upward trajectory.

As a parent, I have a responsibility to do everything possible to ensure my kids get the best public educations possible. As a homeowner, I want to know that my local school district is excelling, exceeding expectations. As a taxpayer, I expect my taxes are being well spent and my schools performing above the state mean. And as an advocate, I demand that all children -- regardless of their race, family income, or zip code -- have access to great public schools.

Rather than looking to exclude key stakeholders from the ed reform discussion, we should instead be focused on how to build greater awareness and involvement from all of those in the educational village. It is the only way we will make the progress needed ... and it may be the one way we ensure that others at the table don't place the blame solely at the feet of our teachers. We all need to own the reform process.