Eduflack: Hey Congressman, Read(ing First) Me

Eduflack

Improving Education Through Effective Communications

Back to Main Page
About Eduflack

Eduflack is written by Patrick Riccards, one of the nation's leading education communications strategists. In 2009, Pat was named one of the top communications professionals in the nation by PRWeek, the first time an individual from the education sector received the honor. In 2011, Pat was named the Not-for-Profit Communicator of the Year by Bulldog Reporter.

He has worked with a wide range of distinguished organizations over his career, including American Institutes for Research, International Baccalaureate, National Governors Association, National Reading Panel, U.S. Department of Education, and many others. Pat began his career on Capitol Hill, where he held senior positions for members of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives.

Before moving to Connecticut in 2012, Pat served as both chairman and vice chairman of one of the top school districts in the greater Washington, DC area.

Comments? Questions? Rants? Contact Pat at eduflack@eduflack.com Or follow his news updates on Twitter @Eduflack
Quick Search

Search only in titles: Keyword:

Search in:

Date Range:

Advanced Search

Basic Search
May 2012

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Syndicate
Monthly Archives
Category Archives
Recent Posts
1. "They'd Rather FIght Everything ..."
  Tuesday, May 22, 2012
2. "A Well-Run Charter System ..."
  Monday, May 21, 2012
3. Just the Facts
  Thursday, May 17, 2012
4. "Meaningful Education Reforms" in CT
  Wednesday, May 16, 2012
5. Migrating from AYP
  Tuesday, May 15, 2012
6. Real Reform in the CT
  Wednesday, May 09, 2012
7. Speaking for Students
  Thursday, May 03, 2012
8. Should Teacher Eval Mean Something?
  Wednesday, May 02, 2012
9. The Most Useless College Majors
  Monday, April 23, 2012
10. The Eduflack Theme Song
  Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Recent Comments
1. Deane Alban on The Most Useless College Majors
  5/16/2012
2. education analytics for k-12 on Real Reform in the CT
  5/10/2012
3. George Peterman on Speaking for Students
  5/3/2012
4. php training in kolkata on The Most Useless College Majors
  5/2/2012
5. John Doe on The Most Useless College Majors
  4/24/2012
6. Fred Deutsch on The Most Useless College Majors
  4/23/2012
7. TJ on Tenure is "Not a Shield for Incompetence"
  4/6/2012
8. lutrsienna on "Teachers Matter"
  3/16/2012
9. rod ruger on The Effectiveness of IB
  3/15/2012
10. Melissa on Lessons Learned from the School Board
  3/15/2012
Subscribe

Blog Post
Recommended Blogs and Websites
Disclaimer

All of the entries on Eduflack are the opinion of the author.

Hey Congressman, Read(ing First) Me

As this is Eduflack's de facto Reading First week (I know, how is this week any different than the others), I thought I would share a very interesting and powerful document that has just passed our desk. Any reader knows that Eduflack has refused to accept the premature demise of Reading First. Here at the National Reading First Conference, there are thousands upon thousands of educators who share that view.

Now we have an open letter to Congress from Steve Underwood, who has been running RF point out in Idaho. For those in the dark, Idaho is one of the great RF success stories.

I'll let the letter speak for itself.

July 27, 2008

Honorable Members of Congress:

Early reading skills are very closely matched to the lifelong ability to read. This is why Reading First targeted Kindergarten through 3^rd Grade. Reading First has been tremendously successful throughout the nation over the course of the past few years and is worthy to receive continued funding and support.

Reading First is a school improvement model that works at many different levels to improve the practices among schools that have traditionally had significant struggles in teaching children from disadvantaged backgrounds how to read at an early age. Two very large obstacles must be overcome in this process of school improvement: 1) the professional knowledge of teachers, principals, and other district leadership, and 2) the emotional challenge involved with the significance of what is known as “second-order change” (e.g., not simply minor adjustments in practice and systems of organizations, but large-scale change).To have the knowledge without the second-order change, or vice versa, does not result in a changed school nor in the improvement Thus, these processes of change are at the root of Reading First, making it a very worthy, but difficult task.

Despite these two very large obstacles, the Reading First model has succeeded in causing monumental changes in student performance throughout the United States over the course of the past five years. Traditionally, large scale improvement in reading achievement is not seen in overall populations or in subpopulations. This is the very reason for Reading First. Therefore, it is significant when we see Reading First populations, which are made up of thousands of students, improving by even as much as 5%. However, when improvements of 10-20⁺% are seen, it is unheard of. This is exactly what is happening in Reading First schools and states.

In Idaho, for example, we have seen tremendous gains in student achievement over the past five years. Here are a few of the highlights.

Idaho 2002-2007: Fluency Gain in Percentage of Proficient Students
Kindergarten	All Students	+21%
Grade 1	All Students	+12%
Grade 2	All Students	+7%
Grade 3	All Students	+7%
Kindergarten	Economically Disadvantaged (Low-SES)	+22%
Grade 1	Economically Disadvantaged (Low-SES)	+25%
Grade 2	Economically Disadvantaged (Low-SES)	+20%
Grade 3	Economically Disadvantaged (Low-SES)	+17%

The significance of the growth happening can been seen especially when comparing Reading First schools to the rest of the state. In Idaho, all students in Kindergarten through Grade 3 take the same fluency test, regardless of participation in Reading First. Here is a chart that demonstrates the difference in growth in just one year (SY 2007-2008) when comparing Reading First (RF) schools’ fluency gains to the state of Idaho (State) as a whole. Please note that all RF grades are greater in gains than the State, with the exception of Grade 2 which is equal. Particularly noteworthy are the very large gains in achievement in Kindergarten and Grade 1 which are nearly double that of the State.

(Editor's Note: The original letter contains a power graph, that tracks the following in Idaho
GRADE                                        Non-RF Gain                        RF Gain
Kindergarten                                    +16                                    +30
First Grade                                         +17                                    +28
Second Grade                                   +7                                       +7
Third Grade                                        +10                                    +13

Similar improvements are seen in comprehension assessments, especially when looking at economically disadvantaged students who are at the very core of the Reading First model. The following diagram illustrates the vast improvements among this subpopulation of Idaho’s students.

Idaho 2002-2007: Comprehension Gain in Percentage of Proficient Students
Grade 1	Economically Disadvantaged (Low-SES)	+20%
Grade 2	Economically Disadvantaged (Low-SES)	+24%
Grade 3	Economically Disadvantaged (Low-SES)	+22%

Between the requirement to report data for comprehension and fluency which is disaggregated by many subpopulations, there are 18 data points per state per year per cohort. States often have 3 cohorts. That creates about 54 data points per state per year. It is true that not all 54 points are improving in every state every year. If they were, this would be nothing less than miraculous. However, many data points are moving in very significant ways. This shows the success of the Reading First model. The chart below gives a synopsis of many such improvements occurring in the Western region of the United States based on both the US Department of Education Annual Performance Data for Reading First and data collected and shared in a report given by the Western Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center in April, 2008. It is by no means a comprehensive summary of the improvements; it simply highlights some of the significant growth occurring in this school improvement model.

State	Grade	Students[i]	Improvement	Reported Measure[ii]	Timeframe
Alaska	1^st	All	+9%	Fluency	2004-2007
Alaska	2^nd	All	+14%	Fluency	2004-2007
Alaska	3^rd	All	+10%	Fluency	2004-2007
American Samoa	1^st	All	+2%	Fluency	2004-2006
American Samoa	2^nd	All	+5%	Fluency	2004-2006
American Samoa	3^rd	All	+12%	Fluency	2004-2006
Arizona	3^rd	All	+13%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Arizona	3^rd	All	+25%	Fluency	2004-2007
Bureau of Indian Education	1^st	All	+4%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Bureau of Indian Education	2^nd	All	+6%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Bureau of Indian Education	3^rd	All	+6%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Bureau of Indian Education	K	All	+11%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Bureau of Indian Education	1^st	All	+18%	Fluency	2004-2006
Bureau of Indian Education	2^nd	All	+11%	Fluency	2004-2006
Bureau of Indian Education	3^rd	All	+21%	Fluency	2004-2006
California	“Since 2002, Grades 2, 3, and 4 teachers and students in high implementation Reading First schools have outperformed all non-Reading First schools in the increase of the percent of proficient scores” on the California Standards Test (E. Jankowski, WRRFTAC Western States Directors Meeting, April, 2008).
California	2^nd	All	+22%	Comprehension	2002-2007
California	3^rd	All	+12%	Comprehension	2002-2007
California	4^th	All	+20%	Comprehension	2002-2007
Colorado	3^rd	All	+11%	Comprehension	2005-2007
Colorado	1^st	All	+20%	Fluency	Winter 2006-Winter 2008
Colorado	2^nd	All	+13%	Fluency	Winter 2006-Winter 2008
Colorado	3^rd	All	+12%	Fluency	Winter 2006-Winter 2008
Colorado	K	All	+16%	Fluency	Winter 2006-Winter 2008
Hawaii	3^rd	All	+26%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Idaho	1^st	Low-SES	+20%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Idaho	2^nd	Low-SES	+24%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Idaho	3^rd	Low-SES	+22%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Idaho	1^st	Low-SES	+17%	Fluency	2004-2007
Idaho	2^nd	Low-SES	+18%	Fluency	2004-2007
Idaho	3^rd	Low-SES	+14%	Fluency	2004-2007
Minnesota	1^st	All	+4%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Minnesota	2^nd	All	+5%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Minnesota	3^rd	All	+13%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Minnesota	1^st	All	+6%	Fluency	2004-2007
Minnesota	2^nd	All	+6%	Fluency	2004-2007
Minnesota	3^rd	All	+4%	Fluency	2004-2007
Montana	4^th	All	+8%	Comprehension	2003-2007
Montana	1^st	All	+16%	Fluency	2004-2007
Montana	2^nd	All	+16%	Fluency	2004-2007
Montana	3^rd	All	+16%	Fluency	2004-2007
Montana	K	All	+18%	Fluency	2004-2007
Nebraska	2^nd	All	+27%	Comprehension	2005-2007
Nebraska	3^rd	All	+16%	Comprehension	2005-2007
Nebraska	1^st	All	+20%	Fluency	2005-2007
Nebraska	2^nd	All	+18%	Fluency	2005-2007
Nebraska	3^rd	All	+24%	Fluency	2005-2007
Nevada	3^rd	All	+1%	Comprehension (ITBS)	2005-2007
Nevada	3^rd	ELL	+14%	Comprehension (ITBS)	2005-2007
Nevada	3^rd	All	+15%	Comprehension (NV Crit. Rf. Test)	2005-2007
Nevada	3^rd	ELL	+18%	Comprehension (NV Crit. Rf. Test)	2005-2007
Nevada	1^st	All	+18%	Comprehension(ITBS)	2005-2007
Nevada	1^st	ELL	+17%	Comprehension(ITBS)	2005-2007
Nevada	2^nd	All	+11%	Comprehension(ITBS)	2005-2007
Nevada	2^nd	ELL	+23%	Comprehension(ITBS)	2005-2007
New Mexico	1^st	All	+21%	Fluency	2004-2007
New Mexico	2^nd	All	+20%	Fluency	2004-2007
New Mexico	3^rd	All	+19%	Fluency	2004-2007
New Mexico	K	All	+24%	Fluency	2004-2007
North Dakota	1^st	All	+13%	Comprehension	2005-2007
North Dakota	2^nd	All	+5%	Comprehension	2005-2007
North Dakota	3^rd	All	+3%	Comprehension	2005-2007
North Dakota	1^st	All	+28%	Fluency	2004-2006
North Dakota	2^nd	All	+15%	Fluency	2004-2006
North Dakota	3^rd	All	+51%	Fluency	2004-2006
Oregon	K	All	+23%	Alphabetic Principle	2004-2006
Oregon	1^st	All	+14%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Oregon	1^st	All	+15%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Oregon	2^nd	All	+10%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Oregon	3^rd	All	+4%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Oregon	2^nd	All	+22%	Fluency	2003-2006
Oregon	3^rd	All	+18%	Fluency	2003-2006
South Dakota	1^st	All	+8%	Comprehension	2004-2006
South Dakota	2^nd	All	+13%	Comprehension	2004-2006
South Dakota	3^rd	All	+6%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Utah	1^st	All	+18%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Utah	1^st	ELL	+12%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Utah	2^nd	All	+4%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Utah	2^nd	ELL	+6%	Comprehension	2004-2007
Utah	3^rd	All	+8%	Comprehension	2004-2006
Utah	1^st	All	+19%	Fluency	2004-2007
Washington	4^th	All	+23% (*The entire state only gained 13% in same timeframe.)	Comprehension (WASL)	2003-2007
Washington	4^th	Native American	+25%	Comprehension (WASL)	2003-2007
Washington	4^th	Black	+20%	Comprehension (WASL)	2003-2007
Washington	4^th	Asian	+31%	Comprehension (WASL)	2003-2007
Washington	4^th	Hispanic	+28%	Comprehension (WASL)	2003-2007
Washington	4^th	White	+15%	Comprehension (WASL)	2003-2007
Wyoming	3^rd	All	+17%	Comprehension	2006-2007
Wyoming	1^st	All	+26%	Fluency	2004-2007
Wyoming	2^nd	All	+26%	Fluency	2004-2007
Wyoming	3^rd	All	+25%	Fluency	2004-2007
Wyoming	K	All	+52%	Fluency	2004-2007

As is readily seen in this small sample of data from Idaho and other Western states, the Reading First model is making great strides in school improvement as in pertains to early literacy for our nation’s most needy children. There are aspects at the school, district, state, and federal level that can be improved, but overall the program has been highly successful. It is essential that the United States continue to provide this opportunity to our nation’s children by continuing what has worked well and improving upon the model for the future.

Sincerely,

Steve Underwood

Idaho Reading First Consultant

[i] All students or identified subpopulation.

[ii] Fluency or Comprehension: the two types of measures required for the annual performance report data due to the US Department of Education.

Posted by Eduflack at 7/29/2008 8:46 AM

Categories: SBRR, Reading First

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URL for this post

No trackbacks exist for this post.

Comments

No comments exist for this post.

Back to Main Page

About Eduflack

Quick Search

Syndicate

Monthly Archives

Category Archives

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Recommended Blogs and Websites

Disclaimer

Hey Congressman, Read(ing First) Me

Trackbacks

Comments

Leave a comment